header-logo header-logo

11 November 2016
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Bailey v Faithorn Farrell Timms LLP UKEAT/0025/16/RN, [2016] All ER (D) 204 (Jun)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal, in allowing the employer’s appeal and the employee’s cross-appeal, in part, in respect of a claim for constructive unfair dismissal and indirect sex discrimination, ruled on the admissibility of evidence in employment tribunal (the tribunal) proceedings. It held, among other things, that the tribunal had erred it its approach to the principle of admissibility in respect of without prejudice negotiations by wrongly eliding the approach to s 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 with that of without prejudice privilege. Section 111A of the Act had to be read on its own terms and did not import the case law underpinning common law without prejudice privilege.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll