header-logo header-logo

18 June 2014
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Employment claims drop

Employment tribunal claims, which nosedived by nearly 80% after the government introduced tribunal fees last year, have not picked up.

Ministry of Justice (MoJ) figures for January to March 2014 show 5,619 single claims (those made by a sole employee) were lodged, compared with 13,491 in the same period in 2013.

Unison is pursuing judicial review proceedings against the MoJ on the basis the fees make it excessively difficult to enforce employment rights and therefore breach the EU principle of effectiveness. Its case failed at first instance because the judge felt it was too early to assess the impact.

Geoffrey Mead, partner at Eversheds, says: “It is clear the fees regime is having a significant impact on the level of claims.” He predicted that, if the government were to introduce changes, they would “most likely” be a fee reduction rather than wholesale repeal.

 

Issue: 7611 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll