header-logo header-logo

Employment claims nosedive

14 March 2014
Issue: 7599 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

"Dramatic decline" in claims after fees introduced

New statistics reveal a “dramatic decline” in the number of employment tribunal claims being brought, a year after fees were introduced.

Employment Tribunal Service figures for October to December 2013 show 9,801 claims were received, a 79% drop when compared with the same period in 2012. Fees for employment tribunals and the employment appeals tribunal were introduced last year for claims received on or after 29 July 2013.

Geoffrey Mead, partner at Eversheds, says: “Last year, Unison brought judicial review proceedings, challenging the fees as ‘unjust and discriminatory’ and seeking to rely upon the September 2013 tribunal statistic in support. 

“At that time, the court was not satisfied there was sufficient evidence that fees were having a disproportionate impact upon those vulnerable to discrimination or that they were proving a barrier to justice. That decision is being appealed and may be influenced by [these] statistics, not least since the court did not close the door to such arguments, were the evidence stronger.

"It is in the interest of all that the tribunal system is stable and robust. The fact that [these] figures could serve to re-enforce a perception that the tribunal is less accessible casts an unwelcome shadow over the future stability and certainty of the current system. Only time will tell."

Issue: 7599 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll