header-logo header-logo

Employment—Discrimination—Grounds of age

11 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16, [2012] All ER (D) 121 (Apr)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr SCJJ, 25 Apr 2012

The Supreme Court considered the question of age discrimination in employment in the context of a specified retirement age for employees of a partnership.

Robin Allen QC, Richard O’Dair and Dee Masters (instructed by Equality and Human Rights Commission) for the employee. Thomas Croxford and Emily Neill (instructed by Clarkson Wright and Jakes LLP) for the defendant. Dinah Rose QC and Emma Dixon (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (intervening). Declan O’Dempsey (instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP) for Age UK (intervening).

In 1971, the employee joined the defendant law firm. He became an equity partner in 1972. The firm’s partners’ agreement stated that partners would retire at the age of 65. The employee wished to continue to work for three more years and, in early 2006, he suggested to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll