header-logo header-logo

11 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment—Discrimination—Grounds of age

Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16, [2012] All ER (D) 121 (Apr)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr SCJJ, 25 Apr 2012

The Supreme Court considered the question of age discrimination in employment in the context of a specified retirement age for employees of a partnership.

Robin Allen QC, Richard O’Dair and Dee Masters (instructed by Equality and Human Rights Commission) for the employee. Thomas Croxford and Emily Neill (instructed by Clarkson Wright and Jakes LLP) for the defendant. Dinah Rose QC and Emma Dixon (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (intervening). Declan O’Dempsey (instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP) for Age UK (intervening).

In 1971, the employee joined the defendant law firm. He became an equity partner in 1972. The firm’s partners’ agreement stated that partners would retire at the age of 65. The employee wished to continue to work for three more years and, in early 2006, he suggested to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll