header-logo header-logo

11 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment—Discrimination—Grounds of age

Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16, [2012] All ER (D) 121 (Apr)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr SCJJ, 25 Apr 2012

The Supreme Court considered the question of age discrimination in employment in the context of a specified retirement age for employees of a partnership.

Robin Allen QC, Richard O’Dair and Dee Masters (instructed by Equality and Human Rights Commission) for the employee. Thomas Croxford and Emily Neill (instructed by Clarkson Wright and Jakes LLP) for the defendant. Dinah Rose QC and Emma Dixon (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (intervening). Declan O’Dempsey (instructed by Irwin Mitchell LLP) for Age UK (intervening).

In 1971, the employee joined the defendant law firm. He became an equity partner in 1972. The firm’s partners’ agreement stated that partners would retire at the age of 65. The employee wished to continue to work for three more years and, in early 2006, he suggested to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
Careless client checks do not automatically make a solicitor dishonest, but deliberately avoiding confirmation of suspected wrongdoing can cross the line
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
back-to-top-scroll