header-logo header-logo

Employment—Equality of treatment of men and women—Equal pay for equal work

11 August 2011
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Brownbill and others v St Helens & Knowsley Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 903, [2011] All ER (D) 274 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division. Maurice Kay VP, Hallett and Toulson LJJ. 28 July 2011

An employment tribunal erred in law in failing to compare terms in the contracts of employment of male and female employees relating to payment for working unsocial hours, which were said to be more favourable to the male employees.

John Bowers QC and Seamus Sweeney (instructed by Weightmans) for the employees. Karon Monaghan QC and Richard Stubbs (instructed by Thompsons) for the employer.

The claimants were female employees with higher earnings than their proffered male comparators. They brought claims before the employment tribunal under the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EA 1970) on the basis that terms in their contracts of employment relating to the working of unsocial hours within their normal working week were less favourable to them than terms of a similar kind in the contracts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll