header-logo header-logo

Employment—Equality of treatment of men and women—Equal pay for equal work

11 August 2011
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Brownbill and others v St Helens & Knowsley Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 903, [2011] All ER (D) 274 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division. Maurice Kay VP, Hallett and Toulson LJJ. 28 July 2011

An employment tribunal erred in law in failing to compare terms in the contracts of employment of male and female employees relating to payment for working unsocial hours, which were said to be more favourable to the male employees.

John Bowers QC and Seamus Sweeney (instructed by Weightmans) for the employees. Karon Monaghan QC and Richard Stubbs (instructed by Thompsons) for the employer.

The claimants were female employees with higher earnings than their proffered male comparators. They brought claims before the employment tribunal under the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EA 1970) on the basis that terms in their contracts of employment relating to the working of unsocial hours within their normal working week were less favourable to them than terms of a similar kind in the contracts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll