header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment—Equality of treatment of men and women—Equal pay for equal work

Brownbill and others v St Helens & Knowsley Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 903, [2011] All ER (D) 274 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division. Maurice Kay VP, Hallett and Toulson LJJ. 28 July 2011

An employment tribunal erred in law in failing to compare terms in the contracts of employment of male and female employees relating to payment for working unsocial hours, which were said to be more favourable to the male employees.

John Bowers QC and Seamus Sweeney (instructed by Weightmans) for the employees. Karon Monaghan QC and Richard Stubbs (instructed by Thompsons) for the employer.

The claimants were female employees with higher earnings than their proffered male comparators. They brought claims before the employment tribunal under the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EA 1970) on the basis that terms in their contracts of employment relating to the working of unsocial hours within their normal working week were less favourable to them than terms of a similar kind in the contracts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll