header-logo header-logo

28 November 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Case law , Tribunals , Law digest , Employment , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment law

Echendu v William Morrison Supermarkets Plc (EAT, 20 June 2008)

Time for the service of an application under r 3(10) of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993 (SI 1993/2854) runs from when the notification under r 3(7) is sent by the tribunal, not from when it is received by the party. Where the envelope is available, the postmark will constitute authoritative proof of the date of sending. In the absence of the postmarked envelope, an ordinarily prudent person will proceed on the assumption that the letter was sent on the date that it bears.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll