header-logo header-logo

28 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment law

Lakshmi v Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2008] EWHC 878, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Apr

i) If there is a disciplinary hearing and a request is made on apparently reasonable grounds for it to be adjourned, it would be a breach of the implied term of good faith to decline to adjourn it in the absence of good reason not to do so. However, damages will be limited to salary for the period for which the hearing should have been adjourned.

(ii) An employer is only able to rely upon antecedent misconduct of which he was not aware at the time of dismissal as a reason to justify the original dismissal where there is no disciplinary process in existence. In all other cases he must dismiss only consequent to the disciplinary process.
 

(iii) The only basis upon which a court can grant a declaration or injunction
preserving the relationship of employer and employee is where the court finds that a basis of mutual trust and confidence has survived between the
employer and employee.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll