header-logo header-logo

28 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment law

Lakshmi v Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2008] EWHC 878, [2008] All ER (D) 353 (Apr

i) If there is a disciplinary hearing and a request is made on apparently reasonable grounds for it to be adjourned, it would be a breach of the implied term of good faith to decline to adjourn it in the absence of good reason not to do so. However, damages will be limited to salary for the period for which the hearing should have been adjourned.

(ii) An employer is only able to rely upon antecedent misconduct of which he was not aware at the time of dismissal as a reason to justify the original dismissal where there is no disciplinary process in existence. In all other cases he must dismiss only consequent to the disciplinary process.
 

(iii) The only basis upon which a court can grant a declaration or injunction
preserving the relationship of employer and employee is where the court finds that a basis of mutual trust and confidence has survived between the
employer and employee.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime specialist joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll