header-logo header-logo

Employment orphans

27 November 2009 / Sara Khoja
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Sara Khoja considers the territorial scope of UK employment law

Where do you work? Who is your employer? For an internationally mobile employee working in more than one jurisdiction or more than one company within a group the position is not always clear.

The answers depend on various factors and will determine the employee’s employment rights and the employer’s obligations and potential exposure when terminating employment.

Exception rather than rule

In recent years there has been a steady flow of cases in the appeal courts determining the territorial scope of UK statutory employment rights. These largely result from the repeal in 1999 of s 196 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) setting out the act’s territorial scope. This section was repealed as a result of the EU Posted Workers Directive (96/71/EC) and to address highlighted injustices to employees. Nevertheless, it remains the exception rather than the norm for expatriate employees to receive the benefits of UK employment law.

Diggins v Condor Marine Crewing Services Limited [2009] EWCA Civ 1133, [2009] All ER

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll