header-logo header-logo

23 June 2020
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunals under pressure

Employment tribunals need more resources to cope with the double whammy of a growing case backlog and an anticipated avalanche of post-COVID-19 claims, lawyers have warned

The abolition of employment tribunal fees in 2017 led to a substantial rise in claims, but no corresponding increase in resources to cater for the extra work involved, the Law Society said this week, which means long waiting times for cases to be heard.

On top of this, the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on businesses is likely to lead to a spike in claims. Judge Barry Clarke, President of the Employment Tribunals, told a webinar hosted by Outer Temple Chambers earlier this month that he expects an ‘increase in redundancy-related dismissals’ when the furlough scheme ends.

Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘If employment tribunals cannot hear cases in a short timeframe there will be many unsettled claims over the next two years.’

Davis said cases are often listed for hearing more than 12 months from the initial request.

‘Given difficulties with holding in person hearings and the likely surge in cases arising from loss of employment, changes to terms, furlough and other consequences of COVID-19, it is important that employment tribunals are able to get on with delivering justice.

‘At the moment, there is much uncertainty as to how COVID-19 related disputes will be decided, as we are applying established employment law principles to entirely new circumstances. The more cases that are heard, the more judgments that are handed down, the better everyone will understand how employment law applies to what is happening, and the quicker settlements can be reached.’

 

Issue: 7892 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll