header-logo header-logo

23 June 2020
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunals under pressure

Employment tribunals need more resources to cope with the double whammy of a growing case backlog and an anticipated avalanche of post-COVID-19 claims, lawyers have warned

The abolition of employment tribunal fees in 2017 led to a substantial rise in claims, but no corresponding increase in resources to cater for the extra work involved, the Law Society said this week, which means long waiting times for cases to be heard.

On top of this, the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on businesses is likely to lead to a spike in claims. Judge Barry Clarke, President of the Employment Tribunals, told a webinar hosted by Outer Temple Chambers earlier this month that he expects an ‘increase in redundancy-related dismissals’ when the furlough scheme ends.

Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘If employment tribunals cannot hear cases in a short timeframe there will be many unsettled claims over the next two years.’

Davis said cases are often listed for hearing more than 12 months from the initial request.

‘Given difficulties with holding in person hearings and the likely surge in cases arising from loss of employment, changes to terms, furlough and other consequences of COVID-19, it is important that employment tribunals are able to get on with delivering justice.

‘At the moment, there is much uncertainty as to how COVID-19 related disputes will be decided, as we are applying established employment law principles to entirely new circumstances. The more cases that are heard, the more judgments that are handed down, the better everyone will understand how employment law applies to what is happening, and the quicker settlements can be reached.’

 

Issue: 7892 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll