header-logo header-logo

Employment tribunals under pressure

23 June 2020
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
Employment tribunals need more resources to cope with the double whammy of a growing case backlog and an anticipated avalanche of post-COVID-19 claims, lawyers have warned

The abolition of employment tribunal fees in 2017 led to a substantial rise in claims, but no corresponding increase in resources to cater for the extra work involved, the Law Society said this week, which means long waiting times for cases to be heard.

On top of this, the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on businesses is likely to lead to a spike in claims. Judge Barry Clarke, President of the Employment Tribunals, told a webinar hosted by Outer Temple Chambers earlier this month that he expects an ‘increase in redundancy-related dismissals’ when the furlough scheme ends.

Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘If employment tribunals cannot hear cases in a short timeframe there will be many unsettled claims over the next two years.’

Davis said cases are often listed for hearing more than 12 months from the initial request.

‘Given difficulties with holding in person hearings and the likely surge in cases arising from loss of employment, changes to terms, furlough and other consequences of COVID-19, it is important that employment tribunals are able to get on with delivering justice.

‘At the moment, there is much uncertainty as to how COVID-19 related disputes will be decided, as we are applying established employment law principles to entirely new circumstances. The more cases that are heard, the more judgments that are handed down, the better everyone will understand how employment law applies to what is happening, and the quicker settlements can be reached.’

 

Issue: 7892 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Legal director appointment bolsters public and regulatory team

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Firm appoints training partner and four new trainees

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Firm strengthens military claims team with senior associate hire

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll