header-logo header-logo

23 June 2020
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunals under pressure

Employment tribunals need more resources to cope with the double whammy of a growing case backlog and an anticipated avalanche of post-COVID-19 claims, lawyers have warned

The abolition of employment tribunal fees in 2017 led to a substantial rise in claims, but no corresponding increase in resources to cater for the extra work involved, the Law Society said this week, which means long waiting times for cases to be heard.

On top of this, the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on businesses is likely to lead to a spike in claims. Judge Barry Clarke, President of the Employment Tribunals, told a webinar hosted by Outer Temple Chambers earlier this month that he expects an ‘increase in redundancy-related dismissals’ when the furlough scheme ends.

Law Society president Simon Davis said: ‘If employment tribunals cannot hear cases in a short timeframe there will be many unsettled claims over the next two years.’

Davis said cases are often listed for hearing more than 12 months from the initial request.

‘Given difficulties with holding in person hearings and the likely surge in cases arising from loss of employment, changes to terms, furlough and other consequences of COVID-19, it is important that employment tribunals are able to get on with delivering justice.

‘At the moment, there is much uncertainty as to how COVID-19 related disputes will be decided, as we are applying established employment law principles to entirely new circumstances. The more cases that are heard, the more judgments that are handed down, the better everyone will understand how employment law applies to what is happening, and the quicker settlements can be reached.’

 

Issue: 7892 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll