header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Employment—Unfair dismissal—Date of dismissal

Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41, [2010] All ER (D) 124 (Oct)

Supreme Court Lord Hope DP, Lord Saville, Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Kerr SCJJ, 13 Oct 2010

Under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), the effective date of termination of employment is when the employee is informed of the dismissal or when the employee has had a reasonable opportunity of discovering that she has been dismissed. Consideration of the behaviour of the employee should be included in an assessment of whether the employee has had a reasonable opportunity to find out about the dismissal.

Paul Greatorex (instructed by Richard C Hall & partners) for the appellant The respondent did not appear and was not represented..

In October 2006, the respondent was suspended from her employment. A disciplinary hearing was held on 28 November 2006. At the end of the hearing, the respondent was told that she could expect to receive a letter on 30 November informing her of the outcome of the hearing (the decision letter). On 30 November, however,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis will mark the 80th anniversary of Shawcross and Beaumont on Air Law with a live podcast exploring the evolution of aviation law from the Chicago Convention to the challenges facing modern aerospace, taking place on Tuesday 29 September
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Indemnity costs remain exceptional, but parties cannot ignore a case that deteriorates around them. In Lawrence v Associated Newspapers, Mr Justice Nicklin ordered the claimants to pay indemnity costs after finding their conduct, viewed cumulatively, fell ‘well outside the norm’
Public law is in flux following reversals and robust appellate intervention, according to the latest public law update by the team at HSFK for NLJ
Neurotechnology is turning the human mind into an operational domain, exposing gaps in the laws of war
back-to-top-scroll