header-logo header-logo

24 April 2015 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The end of the line?

nlj_24_04_15_smith

Adjusting to the legal aid cuts might be the new normal, says Roger Smith

The bulk of the cuts to legal aid are likely to remain. Public opposition to these outrageous reductions in the entitlement of the poorest in society must continue. However, privately, there are signs of adaptation to what is likely to be the “new normal”.

Labour: look away

The Labour Party manifesto at least contains some hopeful words: “We will make sure that access to legal representation, a cornerstone of our democracy, is not determined by personal wealth but remains available to all that need it.” But, if you thought that this meant a commitment to reinstate legal aid for poverty or family law, think again. Labour would widen the test for domestic violence and rescind the hike in employment tribunal fees. It also expressly commits itself to the Human Rights Act which at least protects criminal and some civil legal aid provision. Sadiq Khan, Labour’s shadow Lord Chancellor, spelt out detail to The Guardian (2 March) uncompromisingly headlined “Labour

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll