header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 April 2015 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The end of the line?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_24_04_15_smith

Adjusting to the legal aid cuts might be the new normal, says Roger Smith

The bulk of the cuts to legal aid are likely to remain. Public opposition to these outrageous reductions in the entitlement of the poorest in society must continue. However, privately, there are signs of adaptation to what is likely to be the “new normal”.

Labour: look away

The Labour Party manifesto at least contains some hopeful words: “We will make sure that access to legal representation, a cornerstone of our democracy, is not determined by personal wealth but remains available to all that need it.” But, if you thought that this meant a commitment to reinstate legal aid for poverty or family law, think again. Labour would widen the test for domestic violence and rescind the hike in employment tribunal fees. It also expressly commits itself to the Human Rights Act which at least protects criminal and some civil legal aid provision. Sadiq Khan, Labour’s shadow Lord Chancellor, spelt out detail to The Guardian (2 March) uncompromisingly headlined “Labour

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll