header-logo header-logo

The end is nigh?

27 September 2012 / Sam Cherry
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Sam Cherry provides an update on chancel repair liability & addresses
a medieval anomaly...

In medieval Britain, the Church was granted powers to charge those owning “rectorial land” for the upkeep of the church chancel.

This historic liability has haunted generations of property transactions and still affects land and properties throughout England and Wales today.

The bell is tolling for this medieval anomaly which will cease to be an overriding interest at midnight on 12 October 2013, but will this address the issue of liability?

The short answer is no, chancel repair liability, attaches itself to land regardless of whether or not the liability is currently noted against the title.

The Land Registration Act 2002 (which came into force in 2003), qualified that the Church of England and Wales had a 10-year period to disclose and register their interests against the titles of “liable properties” or forfeit the right to enforce the chancel repair liability in the future.

As it currently stands there is no single register which can be used to identify properties

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll