header-logo header-logo

The end of puppy love?

18 January 2007 / Trevor Cooper
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The UK is a nation of dog lovers, but for how much longer? Trevor Cooper says the affair may be coming to an end

The death of five-year-old Ellie Lawrenson, who was mauled by her uncle’s pit bull terrier early on New Year’s Day, has inevitably prompted debate about the effectiveness of our dog laws. How do you draft a law that prevents dogs from attacking people when the fact of the matter is that all the time we have dogs there will be occasions when they will act dangerously?

For over a century, the Dogs Act 1871 (DA 1871) has allowed proceedings to be brought against an owner of a dog in a magistrates’ court if the dog is considered dangerous and not kept under proper control. If the complaint is proven the dog may be destroyed or made the subject of a control order. However, the court doesn’t have the power to impose criminal sanctions on the owner.

In 1991, there was a spate of dog attacks on children and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll