header-logo header-logo

29 October 2009 / Deborah Tompkinson , Antonio Bueno KC
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail

Enforcing agreements

art one: Agreements to negotiate—are they enforceable? ask Antonio Bueno QC & Deborah Tompkinson

A familiar clause in commercial contracts requires the parties to conduct negotiations in good faith, usually to settle matters which have not been, or, which is more likely, cannot be settled at the time of drafting. Such clauses may have been influenced by US contracts, where agreements to conduct negotiations in good faith have been held to be analogous to agreements to use best endeavours, and consequently, enforceable, eg Channel Home Centres, Division of Grace Retail Corporation v Frank Grossman [1986] 795 291.

In England and Wales, however, doubts remain about the legal efficacy of such clauses. Concerns centre on whether an agreement to negotiate is unenforceable because it lacks the necessary certainty for contract, whereas the same was not true, for example, of an agreement to use best endeavours, see Walford v Miles [1992] 2 AC 128, [1992] 1 All ER 453.
If these concerns are legitimate, and Walford v Miles has so broad a scope, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll