header-logo header-logo

Enforcing possession orders: clarity matters

01 December 2017 / Brooke Lyne
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Enforcing possession orders in the High Court: Brooke Lyne reviews the meaning of sufficient notice

  • Recent case law has provided important guidance for landlords looking to enforce possession orders in the High Court.

It is often the case that where a possession order has been granted by the County Court, a landlord may seek to expedite the eviction process by having the case transferred to the High Court for the purposes of enforcement under s 42, County Courts Act 1984. CPR 83.13 governs the procedure for High Court enforcement of possession orders. Generally (though not for trespassers or in mortgage possessions) permission is required to issue a writ of possession (CPR 83.13(2)). Permission will not be given unless: ‘every person in actual possession of the whole or any part of the land (‘the occupant’) has received such notice of the proceedings as appears to the court sufficient to enable the occupant to apply to the court for any relief to which the occupier may be entitled’ (CPR 83.13(8)(a)).

In Secretary of State for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll