header-logo header-logo

01 December 2017 / Brooke Lyne
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Enforcing possession orders: clarity matters

Enforcing possession orders in the High Court: Brooke Lyne reviews the meaning of sufficient notice

  • Recent case law has provided important guidance for landlords looking to enforce possession orders in the High Court.

It is often the case that where a possession order has been granted by the County Court, a landlord may seek to expedite the eviction process by having the case transferred to the High Court for the purposes of enforcement under s 42, County Courts Act 1984. CPR 83.13 governs the procedure for High Court enforcement of possession orders. Generally (though not for trespassers or in mortgage possessions) permission is required to issue a writ of possession (CPR 83.13(2)). Permission will not be given unless: ‘every person in actual possession of the whole or any part of the land (‘the occupant’) has received such notice of the proceedings as appears to the court sufficient to enable the occupant to apply to the court for any relief to which the occupier may be entitled’ (CPR 83.13(8)(a)).

In Secretary of State for Defence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll