header-logo header-logo

03 November 2023 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8047 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Entente cordiale: a tale of two visits

145182
Michael L Nash considers the role of the King as diplomat

‘The French don’t seem to like us very much,’ remarked one of the King’s suite as the royal train steamed into Paris, and the crowd seemed hostile. ‘Why should they?’ remarked the wiser King. (Ridley, Jane, Bertie, Chatto & Windus, (2012), p 378)

This one exchange sums up the essence of the royal and national relationship of the English and the French over many centuries: indeed, the King’s wish to start changing the mutual antagonism is made the more significant, as the 1903 visit, made on his own initiative, and with only his inner circle cognisant of his real intentions, was the first such visit since 1431!

Again, it is significant, for England had been ruled by a French dynasty since 1066, and then, during the reign of Henry V, had reversed the situation and become Kings of France, a title they held, for real until 1558, and quartered on their shields, and proclaimed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
back-to-top-scroll