header-logo header-logo

25 September 2009 / David Bywater
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Entering the breach

David Bywater asks, is malpractice in the PI arena the preserve of solicitors?

The government body, Claims Management Regulation (CMR) recently published its 2009 Impact of Regulation Assessment report. This reviews the impact of its regulation of businesses in the claims management arena over the last year.

Personal injury has an annual turnover in excess of £287m—one of the largest sectors by far for claims handlers.

The report warns that malpractice in this sector is now predominantly the preserve of solicitors who ignore the comprehensive rules regarding referral fees. It claims that many solicitors do not comply with their duty to ensure that claims have been gathered in a way that breaches their conduct rules.

Growth sector

The CMR has been in place for over two years and claims regulation is no longer a small niche area. It now regulates over 2,500 businesses and recently had to intervene in its 100th claims management business.

So is it the responsibility of this already over-stretched body to punish malpractice of solicitors in the pursuit of personal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll