header-logo header-logo

18 October 2022
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Equal treatment for students on alternative paths

A pledge to treat students qualifying through ‘alternative routes’ such as apprenticeships the same as those undergoing the more traditional training contract has been signed by at least 17 large law firms, including some Magic Circle firms.

The pledge was created by global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright.

CILEX chair Professor Chris Bones said: ‘An acknowledgement that candidates should be judged on ability and merit rather than their route to qualification will go a long way towards opening up the profession to groups who have traditionally been underrepresented in the law. We would like to see firms like these go further, giving equal treatment to those who have undertaken the CILEX route to qualify as specialist, CILEX Lawyers.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

Sackers—Louise McRae & Annabella Hwang

Sackers—Louise McRae & Annabella Hwang

Sackers recruits new associates

McHale & Co—Shaun Little & Patrick Byrne

McHale & Co—Shaun Little & Patrick Byrne

McHale Co bolsters senior team with head of corporate and head of employment

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
A High Court ruling has clarified the limits of digital communications in disputes over property ownership
back-to-top-scroll