header-logo header-logo

Equality duty in care homes

15 November 2012
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Local authorities must take Equality Act into account

Local authorities must consider the needs of older and disabled people under the Equality Act when planning their services, the High Court has confirmed.

R (South West Care Homes & Ors) v Devon County Council [2012] EWHC 2967 (Admin) concerned local authorities’ duties under the Equality Act 2010, s 149, to “advance equality of opportunity among elderly and disabled persons”.

South West, which runs 400 care homes in Devon, brought a judicial review challenging Devon County Council’s fee rates. Each April, the council sets its fee rates for those residents in private care homes whose fees are paid by the council. These rates are banded according to the individual’s care needs.

South West argued that the fees were so low that some of the homes would no longer be financially viable and were at risk of closure and deteriorating conditions and quality of care.

The council argued its assessment of residents’ needs satisfied the requirements of s 47 of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990.

However, Judge Jarman QC held that the council’s fee structure approach failed “to have due regard, in substance or with rigour or with an open mind, to the need to eliminate discrimination and to promote equality of opportunity amongst elderly or disabled residents”.

John Wadham, general counsel at the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which intervened in the case, says: “We recognise that local authorities and care providers are under financial strain at the moment; using equality duties properly is a way to ensure that spending is targeted in the most efficient way possible to advance equality of opportunity and eliminate discrimination.”

Issue: 7538 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll