header-logo header-logo

Equality for parents at the Bar

30 May 2017
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has backed a rule-change to allow self-employed barristers to take parental leave.

The proposed change, which was the subject of BSB consultation that closed in February, is yet to be approved by the Legal Services Board.

If approved, however, chambers would have to offer at least one year’s leave from practice to any member who becomes a parent or carer of a child through birth or adoption. It would apply to mothers, fathers, and adoptive parents, as well as the married, civil, and de facto partners of biological or adoptive parents. Moreover, each parent would have their own parental leave rights regardless of their partner’s employment status or parental leave rights.

BSB Director of Strategy and Policy Ewen MacLeod said: ‘We think this could help the Bar to retain those with parental responsibilities by making it easier for self-employed barristers to combine work and family life. This could help with efforts to encourage more gender diversity within the profession, especially at the senior end.’

Barristers would not be obliged to take the full entitlement, and would be able to take their leave flexibly so they can maintain their practice and support their income.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chair of the Bar, hailed the rule-change as ‘a culture shift’ at the Bar.

‘This is a watershed moment which challenges the assumption that one parent should have to take more time out of their career, and take on more caring responsibilities, than the other,’ he said.  

‘The Bar Council has been lobbying for rule changes since the introduction of Shared Parental Leave in 2015 because we want parents to have a more equal role and because we want to see more equal numbers of men and women at the Bar. We know that women who leave the Bar for extended periods of time, such as for maternity, find it hard to come back. This move will help to place both parents on a more equal footing.’

Sam Mercer, Bar Council Head of Policy for Equality and Diversity, said: ‘The Bar is serious about supporting parents in the profession.

‘This is an important moment in the journey towards a more equal profession and society. The Bar Council will provide full support to chambers to ensure this change is managed effectively. New guidance will be issued shortly.’

Issue: 7748 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll