header-logo header-logo

30 May 2017
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Equality for parents at the Bar

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has backed a rule-change to allow self-employed barristers to take parental leave.

The proposed change, which was the subject of BSB consultation that closed in February, is yet to be approved by the Legal Services Board.

If approved, however, chambers would have to offer at least one year’s leave from practice to any member who becomes a parent or carer of a child through birth or adoption. It would apply to mothers, fathers, and adoptive parents, as well as the married, civil, and de facto partners of biological or adoptive parents. Moreover, each parent would have their own parental leave rights regardless of their partner’s employment status or parental leave rights.

BSB Director of Strategy and Policy Ewen MacLeod said: ‘We think this could help the Bar to retain those with parental responsibilities by making it easier for self-employed barristers to combine work and family life. This could help with efforts to encourage more gender diversity within the profession, especially at the senior end.’

Barristers would not be obliged to take the full entitlement, and would be able to take their leave flexibly so they can maintain their practice and support their income.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chair of the Bar, hailed the rule-change as ‘a culture shift’ at the Bar.

‘This is a watershed moment which challenges the assumption that one parent should have to take more time out of their career, and take on more caring responsibilities, than the other,’ he said.  

‘The Bar Council has been lobbying for rule changes since the introduction of Shared Parental Leave in 2015 because we want parents to have a more equal role and because we want to see more equal numbers of men and women at the Bar. We know that women who leave the Bar for extended periods of time, such as for maternity, find it hard to come back. This move will help to place both parents on a more equal footing.’

Sam Mercer, Bar Council Head of Policy for Equality and Diversity, said: ‘The Bar is serious about supporting parents in the profession.

‘This is an important moment in the journey towards a more equal profession and society. The Bar Council will provide full support to chambers to ensure this change is managed effectively. New guidance will be issued shortly.’

Issue: 7748 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll