header-logo header-logo

Equality for parents at the Bar

30 May 2017
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has backed a rule-change to allow self-employed barristers to take parental leave.

The proposed change, which was the subject of BSB consultation that closed in February, is yet to be approved by the Legal Services Board.

If approved, however, chambers would have to offer at least one year’s leave from practice to any member who becomes a parent or carer of a child through birth or adoption. It would apply to mothers, fathers, and adoptive parents, as well as the married, civil, and de facto partners of biological or adoptive parents. Moreover, each parent would have their own parental leave rights regardless of their partner’s employment status or parental leave rights.

BSB Director of Strategy and Policy Ewen MacLeod said: ‘We think this could help the Bar to retain those with parental responsibilities by making it easier for self-employed barristers to combine work and family life. This could help with efforts to encourage more gender diversity within the profession, especially at the senior end.’

Barristers would not be obliged to take the full entitlement, and would be able to take their leave flexibly so they can maintain their practice and support their income.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chair of the Bar, hailed the rule-change as ‘a culture shift’ at the Bar.

‘This is a watershed moment which challenges the assumption that one parent should have to take more time out of their career, and take on more caring responsibilities, than the other,’ he said.  

‘The Bar Council has been lobbying for rule changes since the introduction of Shared Parental Leave in 2015 because we want parents to have a more equal role and because we want to see more equal numbers of men and women at the Bar. We know that women who leave the Bar for extended periods of time, such as for maternity, find it hard to come back. This move will help to place both parents on a more equal footing.’

Sam Mercer, Bar Council Head of Policy for Equality and Diversity, said: ‘The Bar is serious about supporting parents in the profession.

‘This is an important moment in the journey towards a more equal profession and society. The Bar Council will provide full support to chambers to ensure this change is managed effectively. New guidance will be issued shortly.’

Issue: 7748 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll