header-logo header-logo

02 August 2018 / Richard Buckley
Issue: 7804 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Damages
printer mail-detail

Escaping liability

nlj_7804_buckley

R A Buckley investigates breaking the chain of causation

  • When will an act of the claimant’s own choosing negate liability for a defendant’s breach of duty?

When will a defendant escape liability for negligence or other breach of duty on the ground that the actions of the claimant, in an endeavour to escape from a situation in which the defendant had placed him or her, ‘broke the chain of causation’ with the defendant’s original wrongful act? This question recently divided the Court of Appeal in Clay v TUI UK Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1177, [2018] All ER (D) 137 (May).

One evening, while on holiday in Tenerife, the claimant and his family went out on to the balcony of their hotel room, only to find themselves trapped when a defect in the lock on the door prevented them from re-entering the room. They tried for half an hour to attract attention, but without success. The claimant’s wife wished to visit the toilet, and they also began to become anxious about looking in on their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll