header-logo header-logo

Escaping liability

02 August 2018 / Richard Buckley
Issue: 7804 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Damages
printer mail-detail
nlj_7804_buckley

R A Buckley investigates breaking the chain of causation

  • When will an act of the claimant’s own choosing negate liability for a defendant’s breach of duty?

When will a defendant escape liability for negligence or other breach of duty on the ground that the actions of the claimant, in an endeavour to escape from a situation in which the defendant had placed him or her, ‘broke the chain of causation’ with the defendant’s original wrongful act? This question recently divided the Court of Appeal in Clay v TUI UK Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1177, [2018] All ER (D) 137 (May).

One evening, while on holiday in Tenerife, the claimant and his family went out on to the balcony of their hotel room, only to find themselves trapped when a defect in the lock on the door prevented them from re-entering the room. They tried for half an hour to attract attention, but without success. The claimant’s wife wished to visit the toilet, and they also began to become anxious about looking in on their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll