header-logo header-logo

02 August 2018 / Richard Buckley
Issue: 7804 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Damages
printer mail-detail

Escaping liability

nlj_7804_buckley

R A Buckley investigates breaking the chain of causation

  • When will an act of the claimant’s own choosing negate liability for a defendant’s breach of duty?

When will a defendant escape liability for negligence or other breach of duty on the ground that the actions of the claimant, in an endeavour to escape from a situation in which the defendant had placed him or her, ‘broke the chain of causation’ with the defendant’s original wrongful act? This question recently divided the Court of Appeal in Clay v TUI UK Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1177, [2018] All ER (D) 137 (May).

One evening, while on holiday in Tenerife, the claimant and his family went out on to the balcony of their hotel room, only to find themselves trapped when a defect in the lock on the door prevented them from re-entering the room. They tried for half an hour to attract attention, but without success. The claimant’s wife wished to visit the toilet, and they also began to become anxious about looking in on their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll