header-logo header-logo

20 November 2015
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU

SM (Algeria) v Entry Clearance Officer, UK Visa Section [2015] UKPC 45, [2015] All ER (D) 124 (Nov)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed an appeal by the entry clearance officer against a decision of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) that had determined that a child adopted in Algeria was an “extended family member” within the meaning of reg 8 of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1003), and therefore entitled to be issued with an EEA family member permit to enter the UK. The court held that she was not a family member within the meaning of Art 2 of Parliament and Council Directive (EC) 2004/38 and reg 7 of the Regulations and, consequently, she did not fall within Art 3 of the Directive read together with reg 8 of the Regulations.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll