header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010 / Paula Harris
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

The EU agenda

Paula Harris charts the top EU legal developments for litigators in 2010

Rome 1, formally known as Regulation (EC) No 593/2008, on the choice of governing law in contracts came into effect in the UK on 17 December 2009.

It seeks to harmonise conflict of law rules in respect of contractual agreements throughout the EU and will apply to contracts entered into after that date. It broadly maintains the principle enshrined in the earlier Rome Convention that contractual parties should be free to choose the law which will govern their contract. It also seeks to clarify the position when the parties have not made any choice regarding which country’s laws should apply.
While the Rome Convention will continue to apply to contracts entered into before 17 December 2009, key changes brought in by Rome I applying to contracts concluded after that date include the following.

The parties’ right to choose the law governing their contract remains the overriding principle of Rome I. However, Art 1 goes further than the Rome Convention in stating

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll