header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010 / Paula Harris
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

The EU agenda

Paula Harris charts the top EU legal developments for litigators in 2010

Rome 1, formally known as Regulation (EC) No 593/2008, on the choice of governing law in contracts came into effect in the UK on 17 December 2009.

It seeks to harmonise conflict of law rules in respect of contractual agreements throughout the EU and will apply to contracts entered into after that date. It broadly maintains the principle enshrined in the earlier Rome Convention that contractual parties should be free to choose the law which will govern their contract. It also seeks to clarify the position when the parties have not made any choice regarding which country’s laws should apply.
While the Rome Convention will continue to apply to contracts entered into before 17 December 2009, key changes brought in by Rome I applying to contracts concluded after that date include the following.

The parties’ right to choose the law governing their contract remains the overriding principle of Rome I. However, Art 1 goes further than the Rome Convention in stating

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll