header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010 / Paula Harris
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

The EU agenda

Paula Harris charts the top EU legal developments for litigators in 2010

Rome 1, formally known as Regulation (EC) No 593/2008, on the choice of governing law in contracts came into effect in the UK on 17 December 2009.

It seeks to harmonise conflict of law rules in respect of contractual agreements throughout the EU and will apply to contracts entered into after that date. It broadly maintains the principle enshrined in the earlier Rome Convention that contractual parties should be free to choose the law which will govern their contract. It also seeks to clarify the position when the parties have not made any choice regarding which country’s laws should apply.
While the Rome Convention will continue to apply to contracts entered into before 17 December 2009, key changes brought in by Rome I applying to contracts concluded after that date include the following.

The parties’ right to choose the law governing their contract remains the overriding principle of Rome I. However, Art 1 goes further than the Rome Convention in stating

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll