header-logo header-logo

14 October 2019
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

EU citizens apply to settle

The EU Settlement Scheme, the process by which EU citizens and family members apply to stay in the UK after Brexit, has received two million applications, the Home Office has confirmed. 

More than 1.5 million people had been granted status by the end of September. Citizens have until at least December 2020 to apply. Security minister Brandon Lewis said: ‘EU citizens are our friends, family and neighbours and we want them to stay.’ The Home Office said it has a helpline for applicants and has given £9m to 57 community organisations to help them assist elderly, disabled, homeless or otherwise vulnerable people to apply.

Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll