header-logo header-logo

EU citizenship: all at sea?

21 July 2017 / Jonathan Kingham
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Kingham explores the UK’s ‘offer’ on residency for EU citizens

 

  • UK and EU proposals in relation to residency/immigration status.
  • UK proposals for pre- and post-cut-off date arrivals.

The UK government published its ‘offer’ on securing the residency status of EU citizens and their family members, on and from the day that the UK leaves the EU, last month. This is one of the key matters to be covered in the initial phase of withdrawal negotiations, which formally commenced on 19 June 2017.

Under the EU’s proposal, which was issued in May, the rights of UK citizens who are residing in the EU on the withdrawal date, or have previously resided in the EU, would be guaranteed by their retaining EU law residence rights for them and their family members, for their lifetime. The same would apply to EU citizens in the UK. The EU envisages a continuing role for the Court of Justice, in order to enforce these rights.

The UK government’s position is rather different. Despite describing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll