header-logo header-logo

13 October 2011
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

EU consumer conundrum

Lawyers voice concerns over new “common European sales” law

Lawyers have spoken out against plans to introduce a second tier of contract law across member states.

The new “common European sales” law, proposed by the European Commission this week, would supplement domestic contract law. The aim is to break down obstacles, such as divergent sales laws, which the Commission claims act as a costly hindrance to cross-border trade, particularly for small firms.

The Commission also claims that traders who are dissuaded from undertaking cross-border transactions due to contract law obstacles forgo at least €26bn in intra-EU trade every year. It estimates that 500 million consumers in Europe lose out on greater choice and lower prices because fewer firms make cross-border offers, particularly in smaller national markets.

Member states would be required to make the new EU law available for sale of goods contracts in which a consumer is involved, or where at least one party is a small or medium enterprise (SME). The law would apply only where contracting parties agree that it should.

However, lawyers fear the proposals could create extra legal complexity and effectively undermine consumer rights.

Vanessa Knapp at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer says: “The market seems to be pointing to other factors, like language barriers and VAT complexities, to account for any missed cross-border trade opportunities, rather than the absence of contract law uniformity.

“One additional concern for UK businesses is how the new proposals’ key principles of good faith and fair dealing, defined as a standard of conduct characterised by honesty, openness and consideration for the interests of the other party, reconcile with the UK principles of legal certainty and freedom of contract. Many businesses have not yet thought about the difficulties the proposals could bring.”

Peter Lodder QC, chairman of the Bar, said that the Council would continue to challenge the evidential need and legal basis for the implementation of such a contract law. “Different contract laws are not a high-priority for the vast majority of SMEs, particularly in the present economic climate,” he said. “What we can be certain of is that the European sales law will increase costs for all and lead to less certainty in law; a double whammy which is in nobody’s interests.”
 

Issue: 7485 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll