header-logo header-logo

EU—Value added tax

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Wheels Common Investment Fund Trustees Ltd and other companies v Revenue and Customs Commissioners C-424/11 [2013] All ER (D) 117 (Mar)

It was settled law that funds which constituted undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities within the meaning of Directive (EC) 2001/108 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 January 2002 (the UCITS Directive) were special investment funds. As was clear from Art 1(2) of that Directive, undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities were undertakings which, such as AUTs and OEICs, had as their sole object, in accordance with the objective pursued by the exemption provided for in Art 13B(d)(6) of the Sixth Council Directive (EEC) 77/388 and Art 135(1)(g) of Council Directive (EC) 2006/112, the collective investment in transferable securities of capital raised from the public. Further, funds which, without being collective investment undertakings within the meaning of the UCITS Directive, displayed characteristics identical to theirs and thus carried out the same transactions or, at least, displayed features that were sufficiently comparable for them to be in competition with such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll