header-logo header-logo

EU: who’s in and who’s out?

25 February 2016
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The Justice Secretary set his hat against the Prime Minister last week as the cabinet split over the EU vote.

With 23 June confirmed as the EU referendum date, the scene is set for a clash of titans: Eurosceptic Michael Gove versus pro-EU David Cameron.

Gove explained in a statement that: “The EU tries to standardise and regulate rather than encourage diversity and innovation.”

He said: “Rules like the EU clinical trials directive have slowed down the creation of new drugs to cure terrible diseases and European Court of Justice judgments on data protection issues hobble the growth of internet companies.”

Gove’s stance puts him at odds not only with the PM but also large parts of the legal profession.

About 300 lawyers have formed a campaign group, Lawyers–In for Britain, to support Britain’s membership of the EU. The group has held several events, and is due to launch a report later this month setting out its case.

Separately, City firms are urging clients to consider the implications of a Brexit. A recent survey commissioned by Herbert Smith Freehills found that, of 200 UK-based businesses, most of the companies’ boards of directors have not yet formally considered the impact of a Brexit on their activities.

 

Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll