header-logo header-logo

09 November 2012
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

European law

Saint Prix v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] UKSC 49, [2012] All ER (D) 327 (Oct)

The following questions would be referred to the Court of Justice of the EU: (i) was the right of residence conferred upon a “worker” in Art 7 of the Directive to be interpreted as applying only to those (a) in an existing employment relationship; (b) (at least in some circumstances) seeking work; or (c) covered by the extensions in Art 7(3), or was the Article to be interpreted as not precluding the recognition of further persons who remained “workers” for that purpose; and (ii)(a) if the latter, did it extend to a woman who reasonably gave up work, or seeking work, because of the physical constraints of the late stages of pregnancy (and the aftermath of childbirth); (b) If so, was she entitled to the benefit of the national law’s definition of when it was reasonable for her to do so.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll