header-logo header-logo

European law

16 September 2010
Issue: 7433 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

British Aggregates Association and others v European Commission T-359/04, [2010] All ER (D) 46 (Sep)

Although the procedure provided for in Arts 87 EC and 88 EC left a margin of discretion to the Commission for assessing the compatibility of an aid scheme with the requirements of the common market, it was clear from the general scheme of the EC Treaty that that procedure should never produce a result which was contrary to the specific provisions of the EC Treaty. That obligation on the pArt of the Commission to ensure that Art 87 EC and 88 EC were applied consistently with other provisions of the EC Treaty was all the more necessary where those other provisions also pursued the objective of undistorted competition in the common market, as Arts 23 EC and 25 EC or Art 90 EC did in the instant case in seeking to safeguard the free movement of goods and competition between domestic and imported products. When adopting a decision on the compatibility of aid with the common market, the Commission should be aware of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll