header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

European Union—Employment—Framework agreement on parental leave

Zoi Chatzi v Ipourgos Ikonomikon C-149/10, [2010] All ER (D) 84 (Sep)

Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) Judges Tizzano (President of the Chamber), Levits, Ilesic, Safjan and Berger (Rapporteur), 16 Sep 2010

Clause 2.1 of Council Directive (EC) 96/34 (on the framework agreement on parental leave) does not confer an individual right to parental leave on the child. Nor is it to be interpreted as requiring the birth of twins to confer entitlement to a number of periods of parental leave equal to the number of children born. It does however require member states to take due account of the particular needs of parents with twins. 

The claimant in the main proceedings was a public servant in Greece. In May 2007 she gave birth to twins. She was granted nine months’ paid parental leave from September 2007. Subsequently she applied for a second period of nine months’ paid parental leave for the second of her twins. That application was rejected and she appealed to the referring court.

The referring

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll