header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

European Union—Privilege—Legal professional privilege

Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and another v European Commission C-550/07 P, [2010] All ER (D) 72 (Sep)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), Skouris (President), Tizzano, Rodrigues, Lenaerts, Bonichot, Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), and Levits (Presidents of Chamber), Rosas, Lohmus, Safjan and Svaby, 29 Apr 2010

In relation to Legal Professional Privilege (LPP), in-house lawyers are in a fundamentally different position from external lawyers, so that their respective circumstances are not comparable.
In February 2003, the Commission ordered the applicants to submit to an investigation aimed at seeking evidence of possible anti-competitive practices. To that end, Commission officials carried out an investigation at the applicants’ premises. They took copies of a considerable number of documents.

The applicants’ representatives informed the officials that certain documents were likely to be covered by the protection of confidentiality of communications between lawyers and their clients. It was decided that the leader of the investigating team would briefly examine the documents in question. During the examination of the documents in question, a dispute arose in relation to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll