header-logo header-logo

European Union—Privilege—Legal professional privilege

23 September 2010
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and another v European Commission C-550/07 P, [2010] All ER (D) 72 (Sep)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), Skouris (President), Tizzano, Rodrigues, Lenaerts, Bonichot, Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), and Levits (Presidents of Chamber), Rosas, Lohmus, Safjan and Svaby, 29 Apr 2010

In relation to Legal Professional Privilege (LPP), in-house lawyers are in a fundamentally different position from external lawyers, so that their respective circumstances are not comparable.
In February 2003, the Commission ordered the applicants to submit to an investigation aimed at seeking evidence of possible anti-competitive practices. To that end, Commission officials carried out an investigation at the applicants’ premises. They took copies of a considerable number of documents.

The applicants’ representatives informed the officials that certain documents were likely to be covered by the protection of confidentiality of communications between lawyers and their clients. It was decided that the leader of the investigating team would briefly examine the documents in question. During the examination of the documents in question, a dispute arose in relation to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll