header-logo header-logo

13 December 2024 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8098 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Health
printer mail-detail

Euthanasia: an ancient debate

200989
As the Bill progresses through Parliament, Athelstane Aamodt looks back at millennia of arguments for & against assisted dying

The name of Jack Kevorkian is little-remembered these days. But in 1998, Kevorkian, nicknamed ‘Dr Death’ by the media, went on trial for the second-degree murder of a man called Thomas Youk. Mr Youk was suffering from motor neurone disease, and Dr Kevorkian’s crime was that he participated in the voluntary euthanasia of his patient. Kevorkian also claimed that he had assisted 130 patients to end their lives because they were suffering from terminal illnesses.

Kevorkian and his case were a cause célèbre (he was convicted and sent to prison), but the arguments about voluntary euthanasia and assisted dying (which are not the same thing) have not gone away. Indeed, the fact that different countries have different laws on such matters, and the foundation of the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland, have ensured that such arguments have remained loud and heartfelt.

Assistance to end life

At the moment, the Terminally Ill Adults

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll