header-logo header-logo

Euthanasia: an ancient debate

13 December 2024 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8098 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Health
printer mail-detail
200989
As the Bill progresses through Parliament, Athelstane Aamodt looks back at millennia of arguments for & against assisted dying

The name of Jack Kevorkian is little-remembered these days. But in 1998, Kevorkian, nicknamed ‘Dr Death’ by the media, went on trial for the second-degree murder of a man called Thomas Youk. Mr Youk was suffering from motor neurone disease, and Dr Kevorkian’s crime was that he participated in the voluntary euthanasia of his patient. Kevorkian also claimed that he had assisted 130 patients to end their lives because they were suffering from terminal illnesses.

Kevorkian and his case were a cause célèbre (he was convicted and sent to prison), but the arguments about voluntary euthanasia and assisted dying (which are not the same thing) have not gone away. Indeed, the fact that different countries have different laws on such matters, and the foundation of the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland, have ensured that such arguments have remained loud and heartfelt.

Assistance to end life

At the moment, the Terminally Ill Adults

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll