header-logo header-logo

13 December 2024 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8098 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Health
printer mail-detail

Euthanasia: an ancient debate

200989
As the Bill progresses through Parliament, Athelstane Aamodt looks back at millennia of arguments for & against assisted dying

The name of Jack Kevorkian is little-remembered these days. But in 1998, Kevorkian, nicknamed ‘Dr Death’ by the media, went on trial for the second-degree murder of a man called Thomas Youk. Mr Youk was suffering from motor neurone disease, and Dr Kevorkian’s crime was that he participated in the voluntary euthanasia of his patient. Kevorkian also claimed that he had assisted 130 patients to end their lives because they were suffering from terminal illnesses.

Kevorkian and his case were a cause célèbre (he was convicted and sent to prison), but the arguments about voluntary euthanasia and assisted dying (which are not the same thing) have not gone away. Indeed, the fact that different countries have different laws on such matters, and the foundation of the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland, have ensured that such arguments have remained loud and heartfelt.

Assistance to end life

At the moment, the Terminally Ill Adults

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll