header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Eventful divorce

Family

Horses that were found to have played a major part in the life of a woman who was getting divorced have been given a £50,000-a-year maintenance grant in their owner’s divorce.

The grant, which forms part of a £1.5m divorce package, is to go towards the upkeep of the animals. The Family Court heard that the divorcing couple had no children and that the horses had become almost a substitute for the wife.

Mr Justice Potter upheld the ruling of the original district judge and said that as both agreed that the wife’s eventing was a major feature of their life, it would be unfair for the husband to ask her to give that up while he continued to be able to provide for her.

Issue: 7338 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll