header-logo header-logo

15 December 2016
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Evidence

Kimathi and others v Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2016] EWHC 3004 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 26 (Dec)

The Queen’s Bench Division dismissed the defendant Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s application to cross-examine 11 translators, who had translated witness statements of a group of Kenyans who had brought an action against it. The court held that, under CPR 32.2(3)(b), the court could control how evidence was to be given, such that there was no absolute entitlement to cross-examine a witness. The court held, by reference to the principles of case management and furthering the overriding objective, that, on the facts, it was not just and/or proportionate to accede to the defendant’s application.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll