header-logo header-logo

Evidence withheld, justice denied

19 September 2025 / Nick Brett , Vicky Lankester
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Disclosure , Compliance
printer mail-detail
230094
CPS non-compliance results in dismissed cases, write Nick Brett & Vicky Lankester. But is change on the way?

Criminal defence practitioners are all too aware of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), the body responsible for prosecuting criminal charges against defendants, failing to comply with directions, failing to provide evidence or disclosure as required, and failing to respond to correspondence.

All too often, deadlines pass with not a word from the CPS. When chasers are sent, these are often ignored, too. It is a frustrating part of a defence practitioner’s work that happens far too frequently, with the CPS appearing to ‘get away’ with it, or even worse, the defence being blamed for not chasing enough times. More importantly, a defendant has to endure the anxiety of unnecessarily protracted proceedings, and any extra expense and inconvenience that comes with that. We are all sympathetic to the pressures the publicly funded body is under, but justice must work both ways; defendants are entitled to know and understand the case against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burges Salmon—Lillian Mackenzie

Burges Salmon—Lillian Mackenzie

Projects and infrastructure team appoints partner in Edinburgh

Gateley Legal—Brian Dowling

Gateley Legal—Brian Dowling

Partner joins residential development team in Reading

DWF—Don Brown

DWF—Don Brown

Banking and finance team expands with strategic partner hire

NEWS
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
David Bailey-Vella of Davis Woolfe and chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers explores the new costs budgeting light pilot scheme in this week's NLJ
Writing in NLJ this week, Nick Brett and Vicky Lankester of Brett Wilson dissect the chronic failures of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in meeting disclosure obligations. From the Post Office scandal to the collapsed trial of Liam Allan, they highlight how systemic neglect has led to wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice
back-to-top-scroll