header-logo header-logo

Evidence withheld, justice denied

19 September 2025 / Nick Brett , Vicky Lankester
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Disclosure , Compliance
printer mail-detail
230094
CPS non-compliance results in dismissed cases, write Nick Brett & Vicky Lankester. But is change on the way?

Criminal defence practitioners are all too aware of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), the body responsible for prosecuting criminal charges against defendants, failing to comply with directions, failing to provide evidence or disclosure as required, and failing to respond to correspondence.

All too often, deadlines pass with not a word from the CPS. When chasers are sent, these are often ignored, too. It is a frustrating part of a defence practitioner’s work that happens far too frequently, with the CPS appearing to ‘get away’ with it, or even worse, the defence being blamed for not chasing enough times. More importantly, a defendant has to endure the anxiety of unnecessarily protracted proceedings, and any extra expense and inconvenience that comes with that. We are all sympathetic to the pressures the publicly funded body is under, but justice must work both ways; defendants are entitled to know and understand the case against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll