header-logo header-logo

“Excellent” immigration cases blocked?

02 May 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers express dismay at MoJ legal aid plans

Proposed changes to legal aid will block immigration cases with “excellent prospects of success”, lawyers have warned.

Proposals for a residence test for civil legal aid and reduced legal aid funding for judicial review are set out in the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation, Transforming Legal Aid, which closes on 4 June.

In its response this week, the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA) said the proposals would result in people with good cases being unable to bring them because they cannot pay or, if eligible for legal aid, are unable to find a lawyer.

Under the residence test, legal aid applicants other than asylum seekers must show “strong connections” to the UK and have lived here lawfully for a year.

ILPA said the proposal to pay providers only for judicial review applications would “undermine the use of pre-action protocols” and make it more difficult for people to find representation.

An MoJ spokesperson says: “There will be some exceptions to the residence test. We would also ensure that legal aid would continue to be available where necessary to comply with obligations under EU or international law.”

Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll