header-logo header-logo

The exception to the rule

13 June 2014 / David Burrows
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail
web_family_exceptiontotherule_burrows

David Burrows questions if the exceptional cases legal aid legislation is being properly applied

In JG v Lord Chancellor and ors [2014] EWCA Civ 656, [2014] All ER (D) 192 (May), the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal from a refusal of legal aid to a child by Legal Services Commission (LSC) (now the Legal Aid Agency (LAA)). Black LJ considered obiter the meaning of “exceptional case determinations” (EDC), in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO), s 10, and certain of the human rights aspects of the scheme.

Lawfulness of ECD guidance

In Lord Chancellor’s exceptional funding guidance (non-inquests) (February 2014) LAA decision-makers are provided with guidance as to how to deal with ECDs. This article asks whether this guidance is lawful in the light of the statutory provision for ECDs, of this country’s duties under the European Convention 1950 and of the case law above, especially in the family law field. In the first nine months of operation of LASPO, eight out of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll