header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 June 2014 / David Burrows
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Features , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail

The exception to the rule

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_family_exceptiontotherule_burrows

David Burrows questions if the exceptional cases legal aid legislation is being properly applied

In JG v Lord Chancellor and ors [2014] EWCA Civ 656, [2014] All ER (D) 192 (May), the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal from a refusal of legal aid to a child by Legal Services Commission (LSC) (now the Legal Aid Agency (LAA)). Black LJ considered obiter the meaning of “exceptional case determinations” (EDC), in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO), s 10, and certain of the human rights aspects of the scheme.

Lawfulness of ECD guidance

In Lord Chancellor’s exceptional funding guidance (non-inquests) (February 2014) LAA decision-makers are provided with guidance as to how to deal with ECDs. This article asks whether this guidance is lawful in the light of the statutory provision for ECDs, of this country’s duties under the European Convention 1950 and of the case law above, especially in the family law field. In the first nine months of operation of LASPO, eight out of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Read All
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll