header-logo header-logo

27 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Expats lose human rights appeal in pensions case

British expats are not entitled to have their pensions index-linked, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled

In Carson and Ors v UK (App No 42184/05), 13 claimants argued their state pensions should be up-rated to bring them in line with pensioners living in the UK.

They claimed the difference in treatment amounted to discrimination and breached Art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Some 500,000 pensioners living abroad would benefit from up-rating.

However, the court found they were not in the same position as pensioners retiring in the UK or in a country with which the UK has a reciprocal agreement.

There were too many economic and social variables to allow for a comparison between pensioners in the UK and abroad.

The court did not consider the applicants’ payment of National Insurance contributions “to be of any more significance than the fact that they may have paid income tax or other taxes while domiciled there”.

Carson, who lives in South Africa, receives £67.50 a week compared with the £95.25 given to UK pensioners.
 

Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll