header-logo header-logo

27 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Expats lose human rights appeal in pensions case

British expats are not entitled to have their pensions index-linked, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled

In Carson and Ors v UK (App No 42184/05), 13 claimants argued their state pensions should be up-rated to bring them in line with pensioners living in the UK.

They claimed the difference in treatment amounted to discrimination and breached Art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Some 500,000 pensioners living abroad would benefit from up-rating.

However, the court found they were not in the same position as pensioners retiring in the UK or in a country with which the UK has a reciprocal agreement.

There were too many economic and social variables to allow for a comparison between pensioners in the UK and abroad.

The court did not consider the applicants’ payment of National Insurance contributions “to be of any more significance than the fact that they may have paid income tax or other taxes while domiciled there”.

Carson, who lives in South Africa, receives £67.50 a week compared with the £95.25 given to UK pensioners.
 

Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll