header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Expert advice

Individual and business consumers will play a key role in shaping the future regulation of lawyers.

Individual and business consumers will play a key role in shaping the future regulation of lawyers.

In a first for the legal profession, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has appointed an independent eight-member consumer panel to help shape the regulatory framework of lawyers.

The consumer panel, which will be chaired by Dr Dianne Hayter, the former vice-chairman of the financial services consumer panel, will operate independently of the LSB and will work to develop a sharper focus on consumer interests.

It will publish its advice. If the LSB chooses to ignore this advice, it will be required to justify its decision in a published written statement.

Hayter, who was appointed to her post in July, said the panel would assess proposals “from the standpoint of users of legal services”.

The establishment of the Panel is a statutory requirement of the Legal Services Act 2007.

The experience of Panel members covers trading standards, housing, business advice, employment law, health care, policing and refugee policy.

Panel appointees include: Carol Brady, a director at the Local Better Regulation Office; Graham Corbett, senior national officer at the Commercial Services Union; Paul Munden, who has held senior board posts at Business Link; and Karin Woodley, the former chief executive of the Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust.
 

Issue: 7394 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll