header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Expert advice

Individual and business consumers will play a key role in shaping the future regulation of lawyers.

Individual and business consumers will play a key role in shaping the future regulation of lawyers.

In a first for the legal profession, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has appointed an independent eight-member consumer panel to help shape the regulatory framework of lawyers.

The consumer panel, which will be chaired by Dr Dianne Hayter, the former vice-chairman of the financial services consumer panel, will operate independently of the LSB and will work to develop a sharper focus on consumer interests.

It will publish its advice. If the LSB chooses to ignore this advice, it will be required to justify its decision in a published written statement.

Hayter, who was appointed to her post in July, said the panel would assess proposals “from the standpoint of users of legal services”.

The establishment of the Panel is a statutory requirement of the Legal Services Act 2007.

The experience of Panel members covers trading standards, housing, business advice, employment law, health care, policing and refugee policy.

Panel appointees include: Carol Brady, a director at the Local Better Regulation Office; Graham Corbett, senior national officer at the Commercial Services Union; Paul Munden, who has held senior board posts at Business Link; and Karin Woodley, the former chief executive of the Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust.
 

Issue: 7394 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll