header-logo header-logo

Expert analysis

03 November 2011 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Chris Pamplin highlights changes & contrasts in the expert witness market

Expert witnesses have been living through interesting times. They have seen the loss of immunity to damages claims, the inexorable accretion of court rules and guidance, the sometimes over-zealous attention of professional regulators and the squeeze on public finances resulting in some distinctly odd decisions by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and the Legal Services Commission (LSC) over what they will pay experts.

As the largest multidisciplinary expert witness community in the UK, the experienced individuals listed in the UK Register of Expert Witnesses represent an unrivalled source of information on matters of importance to experts and those who instruct them. Since 1995, the Register has regularly conducted surveys of its expert witnesses. “Cross-examining the experts” (NLJ, 26 October 2007, p 1480) looked at the expert witness marketplace in 2007 based on these surveys. Using the 2011 survey, what follows considers how the expert marketplace has changed since then.

The experts

Of the 452 experts who returned questionnaires by mid-September 2011,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll