header-logo header-logo

12 November 2021 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7956 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Expert analysis

63622
Dr Chris Pamplin analyses the results of a major survey of the expert witness marketplace
  • It is now exceptional for experts to have to appear in court in fast-track cases, and it is becoming less likely in the multi-track.
  • Impact of COVID-19 on forensic practice.

As a large multidisciplinary expert witness community in the UK, the experienced individuals listed in the UK Register of Expert Witnesses represent a valuable source of information on matters of importance to experts and those who instruct them. Since 1995, the Register has regularly conducted surveys of its expert witnesses. The following analysis is based on the latest survey conducted over the summer.

The experts

Of the 209 experts who responded by the end of July 2021, 94 were medical practitioners. Of the remaining experts, 34 were engineers, 15 were in professions ancillary to medicine, 9 were accountants or bankers, 11 had scientific, veterinary or agricultural qualifications, 8 were surveyors or valuers and 14 were architects or building experts. The ‘others’ category totalled 24 experts.

Experience

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll