header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 March 2007 / Peter Gooderham
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Opinion , Expert Witness , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Expert evidence assessed - again

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Peter Gooderham considers the latest controversy concerning medical expert evidence given for the prosecution

In a statement to the House of Lords on 20 February 2007, the Attorney General announced a review of cases concerning possible non-disclosure of evidence held by an expert paediatrician who had appeared for the prosecution in criminal cases. The expert concerned, Professor David Southall, is the subject of a professional disciplinary hearing at the General Medical Council (GMC); the proceedings are currently adjourned until November 2007.

This development is no surprise to those following the GMC proceedings. One of the allegations against Southall is that he “acted in a way which was not in the best interests of children and which amounted to keeping secret medical records on them”.

The suggestion that ‘secret’ medical records exist leads to the question: did they form part of the medical records disclosed by the prosecution to the defence? The press release of 20 February from the Attorney General’s chambers indicates that there are believed to be about 4,450 ‘special

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll