header-logo header-logo

Expert evidence from witnesses of fact

16 October 2008
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie delves into the Wembley Stadium litigation to find an interesting reminder of the pitfalls of drafting witness statements

Expert evidence

In a judgment with the potential for broad application, the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has held that engineers in construction litigation who provide factual witness evidence may, in their evidence, also provide expert opinion.

Mr Justice Jackson decided that such expert opinion may be offered where it was reasonably related to the facts within a witness's own knowledge or based upon their own experience.

Though the judgment related to engineers in construction cases heard in the TCC, there is no reason why the principle could not be extended to other types of case heard in different courts.

The case also contained a reminder, to the extent that any of us need reminding, that when involved in drafting statements, we must exercise caution in ensuring that we do not put words in the mouths of witnesses.
The question posed

The Multiplex case arises out of the long running dispute between the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll