header-logo header-logo

Expert instruction

25 November 2010 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Chris Pamplin offers some tips on avoiding your expert putting you in the dock

Lawyers owe a professional duty of care to their clients to instruct expert witnesses who understand the expert’s role and duties in the civil justice system. Nevertheless, as recent judicial criticism of experts has demonstrated, not all expert witnesses understand their role. This is why Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules was changed recently so that an expert witness has to declare his awareness of the rules (whatever that means).
So how can it be that experts still get instructed who don’t understand their role and the rules, and what can you do to provide objective evidence of your efforts to avoid such experts?

At the heart of the problem lies the sheer complexity of the process of instructing experts. From what follows, you’ll see that at least 50 individual steps can be identified in the instruction process. Furthermore, for it all to work properly, the system expects you and an expert (two people drawn from starkly different backgrounds—just

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll