header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Expert instruction

Chris Pamplin offers some tips on avoiding your expert putting you in the dock

Lawyers owe a professional duty of care to their clients to instruct expert witnesses who understand the expert’s role and duties in the civil justice system. Nevertheless, as recent judicial criticism of experts has demonstrated, not all expert witnesses understand their role. This is why Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules was changed recently so that an expert witness has to declare his awareness of the rules (whatever that means).
So how can it be that experts still get instructed who don’t understand their role and the rules, and what can you do to provide objective evidence of your efforts to avoid such experts?

At the heart of the problem lies the sheer complexity of the process of instructing experts. From what follows, you’ll see that at least 50 individual steps can be identified in the instruction process. Furthermore, for it all to work properly, the system expects you and an expert (two people drawn from starkly different backgrounds—just

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll