header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Expert instruction

Chris Pamplin offers some tips on avoiding your expert putting you in the dock

Lawyers owe a professional duty of care to their clients to instruct expert witnesses who understand the expert’s role and duties in the civil justice system. Nevertheless, as recent judicial criticism of experts has demonstrated, not all expert witnesses understand their role. This is why Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules was changed recently so that an expert witness has to declare his awareness of the rules (whatever that means).
So how can it be that experts still get instructed who don’t understand their role and the rules, and what can you do to provide objective evidence of your efforts to avoid such experts?

At the heart of the problem lies the sheer complexity of the process of instructing experts. From what follows, you’ll see that at least 50 individual steps can be identified in the instruction process. Furthermore, for it all to work properly, the system expects you and an expert (two people drawn from starkly different backgrounds—just

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll