header-logo header-logo

Expert preparation

27 May 2010 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession , CPR
printer mail-detail

Mark Solon explains how to prepare experts for trial

The majority of disputes now settle well before trial. Therefore solicitors often have little experience of the steps that need to be taken in the few months before trial, including in relation to expert evidence.

Permission from the court is essential for an expert witness to give oral evidence at trial. This will not usually be given until after the pre-trial checklist has been filed, except in large or complex cases where there has been a case management conference after the experts’ reports have been disclosed.

The pre-trial checklist requires solicitors:

  • to list the names and fields of expertise of their experts, and indicate for each one whether they are a joint expert, and whether their report is agreed;
  • to state whether there has been a discussion between experts and whether they have signed a joint statement; and
  • to give dates to avoid if experts are to be required to give oral evidence, and the trial date is not yet fixed.

If you

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll