header-logo header-logo

27 October 2023 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 8046 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Expert witness: When the expert is unregulated

144117
Is the unregulated expert still an expert? Who decides? Chris Pamplin investigates
  • Covers two recent challenges to unregulated experts.
  • Explores recent cases of an unregulated family psychologist offering expertise on parental alienation, and an ‘app and payments’ expert in a competition dispute.
  • Highlights guidance given by the most senior family judge.

It is perfectly possible for a person to act as an expert witness even though they are not subject to the oversight of a professional regulating body. It is important, however, that the court is vigilant when deciding whether to admit such evidence.

Two unrelated cases before the courts have considered the nature and admissibility of expert evidence where the expert is unregulated or the area of expertise was not governed by recognised standards.

The psychologist

In the first of these, Re C (Parental Alienation: Instruction of Expert) [2023] EWHC 345 (Fam), Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, offered guidance on the instruction of unregulated psychologists as experts in family proceedings. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll