header-logo header-logo

27 October 2023 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 8046 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Expert witness: When the expert is unregulated

144117
Is the unregulated expert still an expert? Who decides? Chris Pamplin investigates
  • Covers two recent challenges to unregulated experts.
  • Explores recent cases of an unregulated family psychologist offering expertise on parental alienation, and an ‘app and payments’ expert in a competition dispute.
  • Highlights guidance given by the most senior family judge.

It is perfectly possible for a person to act as an expert witness even though they are not subject to the oversight of a professional regulating body. It is important, however, that the court is vigilant when deciding whether to admit such evidence.

Two unrelated cases before the courts have considered the nature and admissibility of expert evidence where the expert is unregulated or the area of expertise was not governed by recognised standards.

The psychologist

In the first of these, Re C (Parental Alienation: Instruction of Expert) [2023] EWHC 345 (Fam), Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, offered guidance on the instruction of unregulated psychologists as experts in family proceedings. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll