header-logo header-logo

Experts in court: Blackstone's & Archibold

24 May 2021 / John Cooper KC
Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
49696
John Cooper QC returns to share his expert reflections on Blackstone’s and Archbold

From Blackstone’s

It has been a difficult year for the criminal courts and those who practise in them, a point specifically acknowledged in the preface to the 30th anniversary edition of Blackstone’s Criminal Practice, published in 2020 by OUP, where it notes that COVID-19 has created ‘unprecedented challenges for the criminal justice system’.

It rightly refers to the impact of the COVID-19 regulations and the Coronavirus Act 2020 which continue to cause controversy and, at times, confusion in their implementation, not least in the minds of the police and Crown Prosecution Service.

Interestingly, the preface emphasises the important contribution made by the regular supplements provided throughout the year, which keep practitioners completely up to date with a fast-moving situation. A few words need to be said about these supplements. Often forgotten in the context of reviewing the substantive work, they are increasingly essential in an area of law that is one of the fastest developing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll