header-logo header-logo

13 October 2017
Issue: 7765 / Categories: Legal News , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

The expert's view: 2017 expert witness survey

Single joint experts (SJEs) are in decline, according to a survey by the UK Register of Expert Witnesses. Only 55% of experts have been instructed as SJEs in the past two years, compared to 73% in 2011. They received, on average, five SJE instructions in each year, compared to about 15 in 2009.

Medical experts charge, on average, £226 per hour for writing reports, and £1,680 for a day in court.

The 201 experts who responded say they are reluctant to accept instructions from litigants in person—66% never take such instructions; of those who do, the vast majority take just a handful each year. Payment appears to be one of the difficulties associated with litigants in person, since the percentage of experts requiring payment on account in such cases has risen to 51% from 38% four years ago.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll