header-logo header-logo

Extending CPD

25 September 2009 / Jane Ching
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Jane Ching looks at making the most of, & going beyond, CPD

Lawyers generally do not have a postgraduate tradition of study after qualification; this is perhaps not unnatural for a profession that has largely prescribed and administered its own qualification and continuing professional development (CPD) arrangements. It was not until 1979, for example, that a law degree was, for solicitors, regarded as anything more than an exemption from the profession’s own qualification structure.

However, other professions, and significantly those other professions which we may find ourselves working alongside—as the ramifications of the Legal Services Act 2007 and the shape of the “alternative business structure” emerge— have developed extensive post-qualification structures. Some expect newly qualifieds to move through a sequence of objectively determined stages (associate, member, fellow, chartered); in others a masters’ or doctorate-level qualification is assumed as part of one’s progression.

Increasingly as the Legal Services Act 2007 takes hold, lawyers might find themselves working with members of other professions for whom acquisition of, say, an MBA, is the norm for progression at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll