header-logo header-logo

Extending CPD

25 September 2009 / Jane Ching
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Jane Ching looks at making the most of, & going beyond, CPD

Lawyers generally do not have a postgraduate tradition of study after qualification; this is perhaps not unnatural for a profession that has largely prescribed and administered its own qualification and continuing professional development (CPD) arrangements. It was not until 1979, for example, that a law degree was, for solicitors, regarded as anything more than an exemption from the profession’s own qualification structure.

However, other professions, and significantly those other professions which we may find ourselves working alongside—as the ramifications of the Legal Services Act 2007 and the shape of the “alternative business structure” emerge— have developed extensive post-qualification structures. Some expect newly qualifieds to move through a sequence of objectively determined stages (associate, member, fellow, chartered); in others a masters’ or doctorate-level qualification is assumed as part of one’s progression.

Increasingly as the Legal Services Act 2007 takes hold, lawyers might find themselves working with members of other professions for whom acquisition of, say, an MBA, is the norm for progression at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll